Yahoo Article: Top 10 best teams NOT to win a title in the decade

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/blog/ball_dont_lie/post/The-10-best-teams-of-the-decade-never-to-win-a-c?urn=nba,184569


Agree with the list? Disagree?

HAHAHAAH

is gary payton checking out RIP?

But yeah.. I agree with most of it.

RƠƇҠ ƠƝ wrote:

HAHAHAAH

is gary payton checking out RIP?

LMAO just caught that

Yea i agree
But the fact that they said Lebron is the greatest player in the game is wrong.
Lebron is good but Kobe is the best

I can't agree with Cavs 09 being the best not to win. Celtics were more talented when healthy anyway.

Blaze wrote:

RƠƇҠ ƠƝ wrote:

HAHAHAAH

is gary payton checking out RIP?

LMAO just caught that

And the ref is checking GP out hahahaha

West Coast Bias wrote:

I can't agree with Cavs 09 being the best not to win. Celtics were more talented when healthy anyway.

NO they should of left 2008-09 out because it was the Lakers year and they Won it

Next year it won't be the cavs because they will win

I don't agree with the order, I think the Suns should be higher up. Other than it, the list is OK.

Does anybody agree with Cavs at number one. It isn't a very good list cause of that. They need to fix their order.

West Coast Bias wrote:

Does anybody agree with Cavs at number one. It isn't a very good list cause of that. They need to fix their order.

Kelly Dwyer is sometimes biased to be honest.I have seen other articles by her too. But the way the cavs dominated the year (season) was probably why she put them at the top.

But WCB, I don't agree with you about the celtics... I mean the 2008/09 celtics were not better than the cavs, why? because they were not healthy.

I agree with this. 10th should be Toronto. We had an amazing team earlier! Damn!

PG Chauncey Billups
SG Vince Carter
SF Tracy Mc Grady
PF Charles Barkley
C Marcus Camby




DAMN!

K†™ wrote:

But WCB, I don't agree with you about the celtics... I mean the 2008/09 celtics were not better than the cavs, why? because they were not healthy.

but this list says that Miami is there because Wade was injured and Shaq was slightly injured. So im going according to the lists rules

2002 Kings are the best team not to win a title. 2002 Kings>2002 Lakers>2009 Lakers>2009 Cavs.

The Kings didn't have King James, or a player that approached his greatness, but they were a better TEAM than the 2009 Cavs. If it weren't for the awful, and possibly corrupt officiating the Kings would have won the championship that season. The Cavs had a great regular season, but were not very impressive in the post-season. The Magic took down the Cavs with relative ease. The Magic were a good team, but they were young and inexperienced, and missing their starting PG. The Cavs have no excuse for losing that series and to anoint them the best team to not win a championship is a travesty. A great regular season record is meaningless if you can't step up your game in the playoffs. LeBron is a stud, but we are talking about the best team here, and the Kings are the clear choice.

KB24 wrote:

West Coast Bias wrote:

I can't agree with Cavs 09 being the best not to win. Celtics were more talented when healthy anyway.

NO they should of left 2008-09 out because it was the Lakers year and they Won it

....
Really?
YES they won it but accoriding to the article the Cavs were too talented not to win.
They never said anywhere, they were better than the Lakers.. so you don't have to defend or anything.

And WHAT A BITCH... I only read what she said for the Cavs.. but it upset me even more. lol...
should have given number one to the Kings lol

I disagree with #1

2002 Kings were better than the 2009 Cavaliers

I don't get it the only teams that should have been on the list was the ones who didn't get a championship the year before or after or at all.

JC45 wrote:

I don't get it the only teams that should have been on the list was the ones who didn't get a championship the year before or after or at all.

I agree, that's what I expected when I first opened the article.

By default, I think the Mavericks should be higher on that list, and the Cavs didn't have the best team, just the best player last season.

But if you think about it, the Cavs do deserve a pretty high spot, just not number 1. 40-2 at home is something.
I remember those old Kings. Knocked us out of the playoffs every year.

Yeah I dont think the Cavs should be number one on that list.

I think the kings team/ suns team/ Jazz team was much better then the cavs team.

Unless they did it by records

Well you can't forget the Cavs were absolutely obliterating their other playoff openants and looked like Finals locks.

Cavs Browns Indians wrote:

Well you can't forget the Cavs were absolutely obliterating their other playoff openants and looked like Finals locks.

Yeah, but the list is best teams. The Kings were a better team.

Bibby
Christie
Stojakovic
Webber
Divac
Jackson
Turkoglu


That was a sick team