Lakers vs Celtics Thread

First topic message reminder :

ive looked alot of places for this thread because in this rivarly theres all ways a good argement and i want to argue..

so witch team:
Had The Better players
Witch was the more winning franchice etc.

this thread is a fail...one of the best debates in nba history and it wont go more than for pages...fail..

Celtics have 9-3 against the Lakers in the Finals

They have been less while winning more

Their winning percent in the clutch and overall in the Finals is better

They are more clutch team,it's has been proved against the Lakers,times and times...

Just saying...

Only bad luck stopped the Celtics to win couple of titles in the 90's with the deaths of Len Bias and other dude,not sure about his name..

Defense! wrote:

Celtics have 9-3 against the Lakers in the Finals

They have been less while winning more

Their winning percent in the clutch and overall in the Finals is better

They are more clutch team,it's has been proved against the Lakers,times and times...

Just saying...

Only bad luck stopped the Celtics to win couple of titles in the 90's with the deaths of Len Bias and other dude,not sure about his name..

(YESS DEBATE TIME) (history ftw)

umm...well lakers are more winning cause the have more division and conference tittles,

john wrote:

Defense! wrote:

Celtics have 9-3 against the Lakers in the Finals

They have been less while winning more

Their winning percent in the clutch and overall in the Finals is better

They are more clutch team,it's has been proved against the Lakers,times and times...

Just saying...

Only bad luck stopped the Celtics to win couple of titles in the 90's with the deaths of Len Bias and other dude,not sure about his name..

(YESS DEBATE TIME) (history ftw)

umm...well lakers are more winning cause the have more division and conference tittles,

and they made it to the finals 30 times,made the playoffs more and have only 1 ess tittle

john wrote:

Defense! wrote:

Celtics have 9-3 against the Lakers in the Finals

They have been less while winning more

Their winning percent in the clutch and overall in the Finals is better

They are more clutch team,it's has been proved against the Lakers,times and times...

Just saying...

Only bad luck stopped the Celtics to win couple of titles in the 90's with the deaths of Len Bias and other dude,not sure about his name..

(YESS DEBATE TIME) (history ftw)

umm...well lakers are more winning cause the have more division and conference tittles,

Celtics still have 1 more title over the Lakers

Defense! wrote:

john wrote:

Defense! wrote:

Celtics have 9-3 against the Lakers in the Finals

They have been less while winning more

Their winning percent in the clutch and overall in the Finals is better

They are more clutch team,it's has been proved against the Lakers,times and times...

Just saying...

Only bad luck stopped the Celtics to win couple of titles in the 90's with the deaths of Len Bias and other dude,not sure about his name..

(YESS DEBATE TIME) (history ftw)

umm...well lakers are more winning cause the have more division and conference tittles,

Celtics still have 1 more title over the Lakers

and th lakers have,more winning %,division tittles,conference tittles,more finals appearencec,and more playof appearenecs

This is the most unintelligent argument in the history of rbt. Your both just repeating facts pretending to not be dumb...... and john. they play for titles..not finals appearances..celtics win!

Celtics have more titles.
Celtics have a 9-3 record against Lakers.
Celtics have more All-Star selections.

Lakers have more wins, playoff wins and winning pct, but did you ever wonder why?It's called consistency. While Celtics had a lot of less than 30 win seasons Lakers had only 2, if that's your deciding factor then you can go for it.

When it mattered the most Celtics always came up with the win. Only in 2010 the Big Three didn't have the pride and guts and lost to the aging Lakers.

Last time i checked we are not debating about consistency and/or how many times a team has lost in the Finals, that should be a negatine anyway.

Steph wrote:

and john. they play for titles..not finals appearances..celtics win!

You mean tittles?

Im tyring to get the joke..but i cant seem to

Enlighten me you piece of shit!

Oh

John seems to have problems spelling "titles", and I was cracking a joke on it

IT'S NOT FUNNY WHEN I HAVE TO EXPLAIN IT.

Better Players: Los Angeles
Winning Franchise: Boston

I can win every single conference/division title in the world and all I'll care about is the Finals.

Wade has won more titles than LeBron.
Same amount of ECF titles.
LeBron has won more division titles than LeBron (I think).
LeBron has a higher winning% (I think).
Tell me how they're even close in terms of winning.

Besides.
LOOK AT WHO LA HAS IN THEIR DIVISION.
Suns who were only decent with Barkley, and Marion/Nash/Stoud.
Clipper who are the fucking Clippers.
Kings who were good in the early 2000's and idt anytime else.
Warriors. Rick Barry, Wilt Chamberlain, and who else!?

DAMNIT!

Franchise: Celtics
Players: Lakers

110% wrote:

LeBron has won more division titles than LeBron (I think).

Lebron has more division titles than Lebron?

Raza wrote:

110% wrote:

LeBron has won more division titles than LeBron (I think).

Lebron has more division titles than Lebron?

What?

110% wrote:

Raza wrote:

110% wrote:

LeBron has won more division titles than LeBron (I think).

Lebron has more division titles than Lebron?

What?

Does Wade have more division titles than LeBron or is it the other way around?

CAguyofftoUNC wrote:

110% wrote:

Raza wrote:

110% wrote:

LeBron has won more division titles than LeBron (I think).

Lebron has more division titles than Lebron?

What?

Does Wade have more division titles than LeBron or is it the other way around?

Raza's the dickhead who edited my post in the quote.

LeBron has more.

110% wrote:

CAguyofftoUNC wrote:

110% wrote:

Raza wrote:

110% wrote:

LeBron has won more division titles than LeBron (I think).

Lebron has more division titles than Lebron?

What?

Does Wade have more division titles than LeBron or is it the other way around?

Raza's the dickhead who edited my post in the quote.

LeBron has more.

I'm looking at your original post, it still has LeBron's name in both places...

NO I DID NOT EDIT YOUR POST
LOOK AT IT
YOU SAID LEBRON HAS MORE DIVISION TITLES THAN LEBRON

Raza wrote:

NO I DID NOT EDIT YOUR POST
LOOK AT IT
YOU SAID LEBRON HAS MORE DIVISION TITLES THAN LEBRON

Yeah. Wonder how SK's original post could've changed like that?

Stop it you lying bastards.

110% wrote:

Stop it you lying bastards.

Seriously SK, your original post says LeBron has won more division titles than LeBron...

No shit?