Why sign Bibby

I don't get why the Hawks signed Bibby
Why not sign Nate Robinson he's more entertaining younger and just better
The Hawks would be cooler and more poular with Nate.
The dude just attracts people and attention because of his electrifying dunks.
Nates if you compare per 36 to bibby you would see that Nate is better in almost every way
anybody agree

I don't think the Hawks need a scoring point guard, just one that can distribute and hit a jumpshot when needed.

YOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! Nate Robinson is a PIECE OF GARBAGE player. He's fun to watch when he dunks, but he's a bad player. The Hawks would be cooler and more people would like them, but losing Bibby for that piece of trash would drop them at least 5-10 wins.

Raza wrote:

YOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! Nate Robinson is a PIECE OF GARBAGE player. He's fun to watch when he dunks, but he's a bad player. The Hawks would be cooler and more people would like them, but losing Bibby for that piece of trash would drop them at least 5-10 wins.

Mike(welcome): read this.

Thanks.

Nate may be more entertaining to watch in your opinion than Bibby. At the end of the day though its all about who can do a better job producing for their team and Bibby can do a better job as a PG than Nate can. Nate doesn't even distribute the ball and make his team mates better like other PGs in the NBA.

He is just pure entertainment but not as effective as Mike Bibby.

They feel that Bibby is a better fit for their team...

Justin wrote:

They feel that Bibby is a better fit for their team...

Because Nate Robinson is a piece of garbage player

Raza wrote:

Justin wrote:

They feel that Bibby is a better fit for their team...

Because Nate Robinson is a piece of garbage player

and that too lol

No wait, he is sord of right. They should have let Bibby go. He is getting older and Nate is younger. He is also really athletic.

Rush wrote:

No wait, he is sord of right. They should have let Bibby go. He is getting older and Nate is younger. He is also really athletic.

You could be the most athletic player in the world, it doesn't make you good. Nate sucks and is overrated

True.

Because mike Bibby is a better pg. Mike is a better three point shooter, and a great passer

I am a Knicks fan and I would prefer Bibby over Nate Robinson any day.

Bron wrote:

I am a Knicks fan and I would prefer Bibby over Nate Robinson any day.

ur a fuckin rocket scientist...

Bibby iis WAAAAAAYYYYYYYYYYY BETTER THAN NATE!!!!

all nate can do is dunk...thats it!

Cuz Stone Cold Said So

JDC is a girl?

mikefox5 wrote:

I don't get why the Hawks signed Bibby
Why not sign Nate Robinson he's more entertaining younger and just better
The Hawks would be cooler and more poular with Nate.
The dude just attracts people and attention because of his electrifying dunks.
Nates if you compare per 36 to bibby you would see that Nate is better in almost every way
anybody agree

Nate plays in a very high octane offense which basically inflates every number he puts up, assists, rebounds, points, steals, blocks, and TO's.

Also Nate instead of Mike will screw up chemistry.

Nate Robinson would not even measure up to the same caliber player Bibby is. Not now, not ever, this is truly heresy. Mike Bibby is worlds better than Nate. Bibby is worlds beyond Nate shooting wise, passes more/better than Nate, is clutch, is a leader, isn't a good defender ---but better than Nate (who isn't)? All Nate has on Bibby is athleticism that and 25$ can get you a bus ticket, not much else!!! I as a Knicks fan would jump on a Bibby-Nate trade if they are foolish to take it. Nate Robinson makes terrible decisions on the court he is a bonehead Bibby is a smart player. People that like Robinson don't like him cause of his basketball skills. What skills? His basketball IQ is equivalent to a rock. People that like him only like him cause of his athleticism. Yes, he does have that.

man stop reviving

Haha, I wouldn't taalk if I were you YK.