| Top 50 Lakers of All Time? | |
|
+12J YS KD35 Raza Rush OhYouMadCuzImStylinOnYa?! cbi No Longer DEAD Straight Edge Bluntness Darko Saeed 3-peat 16 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
3-peat NBA Superstar
Posts : 14345 Points : 29421 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-08-10
| Subject: Top 50 Lakers of All Time? Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:47 am | |
| This season marks the 50th anniversary of the Lakers moving from Minneapolis to Los Angeles before the start of the 1960-61 campaign. This year marks the 50th year with 45 playoff appearances, 24 trips to the NBA Finals and 10 rings ESPN made this list. At this point I don't disagree at all. Happy Anniversary Lakers!!.
Agree with list? Disagree? Thoughts?
50. Ron Artest 49. Horace Grant 48. Mike McGee 47.Leroy Ellis 46. Kermit Washington 45. Cazzie Russell 44. Jim Price 43. Ron Harper 42. Sedale Threatt 41. Jim Chones 40. Luke Walton 39. Darrall Imhoff 38. Andrew Bynum 37. Elmore Smith 36. Sam Perkins 35. Elden Campbell 34. Cedric Ceballos 33. Kurt Rambis 32. "Hot" Rod Hundley 31. Frank Selvy 30. Mel Counts 29. Trevor Ariza 28. Glen Rice 27. Mychal Thompson 26. Bob McAdoo 25. Rick Fox 24. Nick Van Exel 23. Jim McMillian 22. Eddie Jones 21. Vlade Divac 20. Robert Horry 19. A.C. Green 18. Happy Hairston 17. Lamar Odom 16. Rudy LaRusso 15. Norm Nixon 14. Pau Gasol 13. Jamaal Wilkes 12. Michael Cooper 11. Derek Fisher 10. Byron Scott 9. Gail Goodrich 8. Big Game James Worthy 7. Elgin Baylor 6. Wilt Chamberlain 5. Jerry West 4. Shaquille O'Neal 3. Kobe Bryant 2. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 1. Magic Johnson
Legend: Indigo: I know him, Or Stu has mentioned him. Bold: On current roster | |
|
| |
Saeed NBA Veteran
Posts : 8780 Points : 25736 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-08-06 Age : 26 Location : West Virginia (:
| Subject: Re: Top 50 Lakers of All Time? Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:28 am | |
| GEORGE MIKAN. Damnit. Fox over McAdoo? Van Exel over McAdoo? You get it, _____ over McAdoo? Luke Walton at #40... Ariza had one very good season, and he's above Kurt Rambis... | |
|
| |
Darko NBA Superstar
Posts : 14143 Points : 33462 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-08-07 Age : 28
| Subject: Re: Top 50 Lakers of All Time? Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:58 am | |
| I disagree with list's parts
Top 5 is what i disagree most.Please,Kobe over Shaq at LA?I don't agree with that
In that list i would give Shaq #3 spot,#4 Kobe and #5 West.
How\s Odom better then McAdoo?
I also think that Pau Gasol could be a spot ahead of his current situation | |
|
| |
Straight Edge Bluntness NBA Superstar
Posts : 10793 Points : 26671 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-08-10
| Subject: Re: Top 50 Lakers of All Time? Wed Dec 30, 2009 1:07 pm | |
| Ron Artest hasn't even played a full season with the Lakers; that doesn't really make much sense to me. Oh ESPN... | |
|
| |
No Longer DEAD NBA Veteran
Posts : 5078 Points : 18223 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-08-17 Location : San Francisco
| Subject: Re: Top 50 Lakers of All Time? Wed Dec 30, 2009 1:43 pm | |
| Uhh....it would help if I knew 30 of the players... | |
|
| |
cbi NBA Legend
Posts : 18953 Points : 38438 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-08-07 Age : 28 Location : Cleve-a-land
| Subject: Re: Top 50 Lakers of All Time? Wed Dec 30, 2009 5:15 pm | |
| So wait.
Luke Walton, Ron Artest, and Ariza make the list? Okay, Ariza makes a LITTLE sense. But why is he so high? Odom should probably be lower.
I dont know. I kinda think that West and Kobe should switch spots, but thats debatable.
24, 25, and 26 should all move up a few spots lol.
who the hell are Rudy LaRusso and Happy Hairston? | |
|
| |
OhYouMadCuzImStylinOnYa?! NBA Superstar
Posts : 11937 Points : 27776 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-08-07 Location : i ♥└A
| Subject: Re: Top 50 Lakers of All Time? Wed Dec 30, 2009 5:41 pm | |
| Fisher at #11 :SMH:
I like the top 5. That's all that matters to me. | |
|
| |
Rush NBA Rookie
Posts : 3758 Points : 16071 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-08-11 Age : 34 Location : Toronto
| Subject: Re: Top 50 Lakers of All Time? Wed Dec 30, 2009 5:42 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Raza NBA Superstar
Posts : 12079 Points : 29734 Reputation : 2 Join date : 2009-08-07 Age : 247 Location : Connecticut
| Subject: Re: Top 50 Lakers of All Time? Wed Dec 30, 2009 5:44 pm | |
| Wasn't Ariza only on the Lakers for a year or two? And he's 29?
LUKE WALTON!??!
I'm going to leave now. | |
|
| |
KD35 NBA Veteran
Posts : 6732 Points : 20173 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-08-08 Age : 27 Location : New York
| Subject: Re: Top 50 Lakers of All Time? Wed Dec 30, 2009 5:45 pm | |
| i dunno half the name's on this list....
who the hell is jerry west?!?!?
j/k | |
|
| |
cbi NBA Legend
Posts : 18953 Points : 38438 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-08-07 Age : 28 Location : Cleve-a-land
| Subject: Re: Top 50 Lakers of All Time? Wed Dec 30, 2009 5:45 pm | |
| - jade. wrote:
I like the top 5. That's all that matters to me. Well thats stuuupid. So nyeah. | |
|
| |
KD35 NBA Veteran
Posts : 6732 Points : 20173 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-08-08 Age : 27 Location : New York
| Subject: Re: Top 50 Lakers of All Time? Wed Dec 30, 2009 5:51 pm | |
| they should make a Top 50 Thunder players of All-Time. | |
|
| |
Darko NBA Superstar
Posts : 14143 Points : 33462 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-08-07 Age : 28
| Subject: Re: Top 50 Lakers of All Time? Wed Dec 30, 2009 7:16 pm | |
| Dwayne,there isn't over 20 players in the history of the Thunder | |
|
| |
YS NBA Superstar
Posts : 12288 Points : 26618 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-08-14 Age : 32
| Subject: Re: Top 50 Lakers of All Time? Wed Dec 30, 2009 7:41 pm | |
| No...this list sucks a lot of balls...
wow...whoever made that list needs to be fired... | |
|
| |
Darko NBA Superstar
Posts : 14143 Points : 33462 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-08-07 Age : 28
| Subject: Re: Top 50 Lakers of All Time? Wed Dec 30, 2009 7:42 pm | |
| I didn't expect that from you ys | |
|
| |
YS NBA Superstar
Posts : 12288 Points : 26618 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-08-14 Age : 32
| Subject: Re: Top 50 Lakers of All Time? Wed Dec 30, 2009 7:46 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
J NBA Rookie
Posts : 2286 Points : 15105 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-08-06 Location : Texas
| Subject: Re: Top 50 Lakers of All Time? Wed Dec 30, 2009 7:53 pm | |
| Kurt Rambis should be higher than Nick Van Exel.
Why are Luke Walton and Ron Artest on the list? If Artest is on the list Smush Parker should be. | |
|
| |
YS NBA Superstar
Posts : 12288 Points : 26618 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-08-14 Age : 32
| Subject: Re: Top 50 Lakers of All Time? Wed Dec 30, 2009 7:59 pm | |
| Artest is already better than Smush ever was.... | |
|
| |
J NBA Rookie
Posts : 2286 Points : 15105 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-08-06 Location : Texas
| Subject: Re: Top 50 Lakers of All Time? Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:38 pm | |
| Yeah, but Artest hasn't even played half a season in LA.
The Lakers have a rich enough history to where he shouldn't have to fill a spot. How about Karl Malone? he actually played a whole season in LA. | |
|
| |
Chris NBA Veteran
Posts : 5401 Points : 18735 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-11-24 Age : 33 Location : Jail
| Subject: Re: Top 50 Lakers of All Time? Wed Dec 30, 2009 9:05 pm | |
| Top 10 Celtic's or LAkers? which is the best? | |
|
| |
Saeed NBA Veteran
Posts : 8780 Points : 25736 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-08-06 Age : 26 Location : West Virginia (:
| Subject: Re: Top 50 Lakers of All Time? Wed Dec 30, 2009 9:35 pm | |
| GEORGE MIKAN!!!!!!!
How the hell you forget about one of the greatest Centers to play the game? | |
|
| |
No Longer DEAD NBA Veteran
Posts : 5078 Points : 18223 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-08-17 Location : San Francisco
| Subject: Re: Top 50 Lakers of All Time? Wed Dec 30, 2009 9:36 pm | |
| He played for Minny, not LA. | |
|
| |
Tar Heel NBA Veteran
Posts : 5845 Points : 19640 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-08-10 Age : 32 Location : East Coast
| Subject: Re: Top 50 Lakers of All Time? Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:39 pm | |
| - SK wrote:
- GEORGE MIKAN. Damnit.
Fox over McAdoo? Van Exel over McAdoo? You get it, _____ over McAdoo? Luke Walton at #40... Ariza had one very good season, and he's above Kurt Rambis... I agree with the Rambis and Walton bits. I'd like to add in that having Artest in at No. 50 after playing less than half a season is batshit insane. But about Mikan, that was my first thought; when I read the article on ESPN though, it's LA Lakers of all time, so all the Minneapolis players (including Mikan) are left out. | |
|
| |
brownie13 NBA Legend
Posts : 20670 Points : 38921 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-08-10
| Subject: Re: Top 50 Lakers of All Time? Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:58 pm | |
| WTH? Eddie Jones is only 22? Jamaal Wilkes should be top 10. How do you not know either of those guys, Abdi? | |
|
| |
brownie13 NBA Legend
Posts : 20670 Points : 38921 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-08-10
| Subject: Re: Top 50 Lakers of All Time? Wed Dec 30, 2009 11:00 pm | |
| Anybody who says Shaq should be ahead of Kobe is a complete loon. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Top 50 Lakers of All Time? | |
| |
|
| |
| Top 50 Lakers of All Time? | |
|