|
| Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO | |
| | Author | Message |
---|
Guest Guest
| Subject: Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO Sat Aug 29, 2009 2:23 pm | |
| He needs to go. He is selfish and doesn't play any defense and makes a lot of stupid decisions. |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO Sat Aug 29, 2009 2:33 pm | |
| Thank you I as a Knicks fan say this all the time. Chris Duhon is a much better player than Nate Robinson. I do not trust a player that shoots .15+ FG% for a total of 2 months then warms up having a hot stretch of games after the All-star game shooting 40+% from the field only to fuck it all up again in the end shooting 20+% at the end of the season. He is terribly inconsistent and does not pass to save his life and really makes terrible decisions and also plays not a single lick of d like you said. Chris Duhon on the other hand is a sound shooter and does not take too many shots he is a pass 1st PG as it should be, but when he shoots he makes them and makes smart plays and nice crisp passes. He was one of the best assist PG in the NBA this season and I had my doubts on him before thinking he would not transition good as a starter because he was always a reserve player. Duhon is also a good on the ball and overall good defender. One of the only players on our team that actually plays defense. He was the model of consistency all season until the 36, once 40+ minutes a night began to take its toll on him and injuries hit. However, this was only because Mike D knew that he could not trust Nate to run the offense because we would be screwed. I say get Duhon Sessions, so Duhon could help him out and they can help each other out, drop Nate, trade Curry and Jeffries and maybe even throw in Hughes if it means we get a temporary good player for only this year, so we do not go over the cap. Someone like Stephen Jackson or Tracy McGrady and seriously keep David Lee NY will be foolish not to if we lose him there goes any chance of getting back to the playoffs. |
| | | King Of NJ NBA Veteran
Posts : 8873 Points : 24015 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-08-07 Age : 35
| Subject: Re: Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO Sat Aug 29, 2009 2:38 pm | |
| I agree with Tony EM
Nate Robinson is to the Knicks what Ben Gordon was to the Bulls
and I think the Knicks need to let need go to free some cap space. He's not going to help the Knicks much down the road | |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO Sat Aug 29, 2009 2:58 pm | |
| - Tony EM Supports Pringles wrote:
- Thank you I as a Knicks fan say this all the time. Chris Duhon is a much better player than Nate Robinson.
I do not trust a player that shoots .15+ FG% for a total of 2 months then warms up having a hot stretch of games after the All-star game shooting 40+% from the field only to fuck it all up again in the end shooting 20+% at the end of the season. He is terribly inconsistent and does not pass to save his life and really makes terrible decisions and also plays not a single lick of d like you said. Chris Duhon on the other hand is a sound shooter and does not take too many shots he is a pass 1st PG as it should be, but when he shoots he makes them and makes smart plays and nice crisp passes. He was one of the best assist PG in the NBA this season and I had my doubts on him before thinking he would not transition good as a starter because he was always a reserve player. Duhon is also a good on the ball and overall good defender. One of the only players on our team that actually plays defense. He was the model of consistency all season until the 36, once 40+ minutes a night began to take its toll on him and injuries hit. However, this was only because Mike D knew that he could not trust Nate to run the offense because we would be screwed. I say get Duhon Sessions, so Duhon could help him out and they can help each other out, drop Nate, trade Curry and Jeffries and maybe even throw in Hughes if it means we get a temporary good player for only this year, so we do not go over the cap. Someone like Stephen Jackson or Tracy McGrady and seriously keep David Lee NY will be foolish not to if we lose him there goes any chance of getting back to the playoffs. Yeah, I am also a Knicks fan and I seen every game last season but one and I always would say they need to get rid of Robinson and let Duhon get bigger role. Duhon even set a Knicks assist record at 22, I think against the Warriors or the Clippers. |
| | | Justin NBA Rookie
Posts : 1415 Points : 13472 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-08-13 Age : 31 Location : BoSToN MA
| Subject: Re: Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:24 pm | |
| No because the Knicks are stupid | |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO Sat Aug 29, 2009 10:47 pm | |
| Yeah it was against the Warriors and Lee had 37 points and 24 rebounds making him the last Knicks since Ewing to have a 30/20 game. I always said Nate has to be let go he is really given the benefit of the doubt because of his athletic ability and his small size, but just because he has athletic ability doesn't make him a good and reliable player. He really hurts us rather than benefits us. |
| | | YS NBA Superstar
Posts : 12288 Points : 26994 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-08-14 Age : 32
| Subject: Re: Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO Sat Aug 29, 2009 10:48 pm | |
| Maybe its only a 1 yr deal..... | |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO Sat Aug 29, 2009 10:51 pm | |
| I actually met Mike D'antoni at my AAU game, I played against his son. We destroyed them, and his son was garbage. After the game I talked to Mike D'antoni and told him to try to draft Curry. They Didn't...
But I asked him if they were gonna keep Nate, and he said he wasn't sure.
Nate doesn't have the greatest shot selection, and really screws up the system. They need Sessions asap, and get the ball to Wilson Chandler. |
| | | No Longer DEAD NBA Veteran
Posts : 5078 Points : 18599 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-08-17 Location : San Francisco
| Subject: Re: Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO Sat Aug 29, 2009 10:55 pm | |
| Nate is truly a cancer for any team he plays for. | |
| | | Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO | |
| |
| | | | Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO | |
|
Similar topics | |
|
| Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| Who is online? | In total there are 34 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 34 Guests :: 1 Bot None Most users ever online was 400 on Thu Jun 03, 2021 11:04 am |
Latest topics | » Rush is hereFri Jan 13, 2017 10:09 pm by Rush » NBA Season 2014-15 DiscussionSat Dec 27, 2014 7:24 am by TonySnell » Convert Camera and iPhone videos to iMovie and iPhoto on MacWed Nov 26, 2014 12:53 pm by AntoineJerry » Stream 2D/3D Blu-ray to Apple TV 2/3 & Xbox 360Tue Nov 18, 2014 9:28 pm by AntoineJerry » Edit MXF Files with FCP/FCE/iMovie/Avid/Premiere on YosemiteSun Nov 16, 2014 4:31 am by EmilyFaye » Enjoy DVD & ISO/IFO image files to Kindle Fire HDXSun Nov 16, 2014 2:57 am by AntoineJerry » Blu-ray Player for Windows 8 PC/Laptop/NoteBookSun Nov 16, 2014 2:29 am by AntoineJerry » How to move Blu-ray movie to Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 & 8.4?Sun Nov 16, 2014 1:58 am by EmilyFaye » How to Play Blu-ray on Mac Yosemite/Mavericks/Mountain Lion?Sun Nov 16, 2014 1:38 am by AntoineJerry » 20% off WebM Converter-Convert WebM to MP4 on Windows 8.1Sun Nov 16, 2014 1:30 am by AntoineJerry » PPT/PPS/PPTX to DVD Converter for Windows 7/8/8.1Sun Nov 16, 2014 1:14 am by AntoineJerry » 2013 Christmas Coupons: 20% Off Windows 8.1/8 Video Converter UltimateSun Nov 16, 2014 1:09 am by AntoineJerry |
|