Real Basketball Talk
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.



 
HomeHome  Latest imagesLatest images  NBA.comNBA.com  Log in  RegisterRegister  

 

 Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO

Go down 
4 posters
AuthorMessage
Guest
Guest




Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO Empty
PostSubject: Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO   Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO EmptySat Aug 29, 2009 2:23 pm

He needs to go. He is selfish and doesn't play any defense and makes a lot of stupid decisions.
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest




Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO Empty
PostSubject: Re: Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO   Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO EmptySat Aug 29, 2009 2:33 pm

Thank you I as a Knicks fan say this all the time. Chris Duhon is a much better player than Nate Robinson.

I do not trust a player that shoots .15+ FG% for a total of 2 months then warms up having a hot stretch of games after the All-star game shooting 40+% from the field only to fuck it all up again in the end shooting 20+% at the end of the season. He is terribly inconsistent and does not pass to save his life and really makes terrible decisions and also plays not a single lick of d like you said.

Chris Duhon on the other hand is a sound shooter and does not take too many shots he is a pass 1st PG as it should be, but when he shoots he makes them and makes smart plays and nice crisp passes. He was one of the best assist PG in the NBA this season and I had my doubts on him before thinking he would not transition good as a starter because he was always a reserve player. Duhon is also a good on the ball and overall good defender. One of the only players on our team that actually plays defense.

He was the model of consistency all season until the 36, once 40+ minutes a night began to take its toll on him and injuries hit. However, this was only because Mike D knew that he could not trust Nate to run the offense because we would be screwed. I say get Duhon Sessions, so Duhon could help him out and they can help each other out, drop Nate, trade Curry and Jeffries and maybe even throw in Hughes if it means we get a temporary good player for only this year, so we do not go over the cap. Someone like Stephen Jackson or Tracy McGrady and seriously keep David Lee NY will be foolish not to if we lose him there goes any chance of getting back to the playoffs.
Back to top Go down
King Of NJ
NBA Veteran
NBA Veteran
King Of NJ


Male Posts : 8873
Points : 24015
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2009-08-07
Age : 35

Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO Empty
PostSubject: Re: Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO   Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO EmptySat Aug 29, 2009 2:38 pm

I agree with Tony EM

Nate Robinson is to the Knicks what Ben Gordon was to the Bulls

and I think the Knicks need to let need go to free some cap space. He's not going to help the Knicks much down the road
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest




Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO Empty
PostSubject: Re: Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO   Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO EmptySat Aug 29, 2009 2:58 pm

Tony EM Supports Pringles wrote:
Thank you I as a Knicks fan say this all the time. Chris Duhon is a much better player than Nate Robinson.

I do not trust a player that shoots .15+ FG% for a total of 2 months then warms up having a hot stretch of games after the All-star game shooting 40+% from the field only to fuck it all up again in the end shooting 20+% at the end of the season. He is terribly inconsistent and does not pass to save his life and really makes terrible decisions and also plays not a single lick of d like you said.

Chris Duhon on the other hand is a sound shooter and does not take too many shots he is a pass 1st PG as it should be, but when he shoots he makes them and makes smart plays and nice crisp passes. He was one of the best assist PG in the NBA this season and I had my doubts on him before thinking he would not transition good as a starter because he was always a reserve player. Duhon is also a good on the ball and overall good defender. One of the only players on our team that actually plays defense.

He was the model of consistency all season until the 36, once 40+ minutes a night began to take its toll on him and injuries hit. However, this was only because Mike D knew that he could not trust Nate to run the offense because we would be screwed. I say get Duhon Sessions, so Duhon could help him out and they can help each other out, drop Nate, trade Curry and Jeffries and maybe even throw in Hughes if it means we get a temporary good player for only this year, so we do not go over the cap. Someone like Stephen Jackson or Tracy McGrady and seriously keep David Lee NY will be foolish not to if we lose him there goes any chance of getting back to the playoffs.

Yeah, I am also a Knicks fan and I seen every game last season but one and I always would say they need to get rid of Robinson and let Duhon get bigger role. Duhon even set a Knicks assist record at 22, I think against the Warriors or the Clippers.
Back to top Go down
Justin
NBA Rookie
NBA Rookie
Justin


Male Posts : 1415
Points : 13472
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2009-08-13
Age : 31
Location : BoSToN MA

Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO Empty
PostSubject: Re: Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO   Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO EmptySat Aug 29, 2009 4:24 pm

No because the Knicks are stupid
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest




Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO Empty
PostSubject: Re: Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO   Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO EmptySat Aug 29, 2009 10:47 pm

Yeah it was against the Warriors and Lee had 37 points and 24 rebounds making him the last Knicks since Ewing to have a 30/20 game. I always said Nate has to be let go he is really given the benefit of the doubt because of his athletic ability and his small size, but just because he has athletic ability doesn't make him a good and reliable player. He really hurts us rather than benefits us.
Back to top Go down
YS
NBA Superstar
NBA Superstar
YS


Male Posts : 12288
Points : 26994
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2009-08-14
Age : 32

Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO Empty
PostSubject: Re: Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO   Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO EmptySat Aug 29, 2009 10:48 pm

Maybe its only a 1 yr deal.....
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest




Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO Empty
PostSubject: Re: Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO   Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO EmptySat Aug 29, 2009 10:51 pm

I actually met Mike D'antoni at my AAU game, I played against his son. We destroyed them, and his son was garbage. After the game I talked to Mike D'antoni and told him to try to draft Curry. They Didn't...

But I asked him if they were gonna keep Nate, and he said he wasn't sure.


Nate doesn't have the greatest shot selection, and really screws up the system. They need Sessions asap, and get the ball to Wilson Chandler.
Back to top Go down
No Longer DEAD
NBA Veteran
NBA Veteran
No Longer DEAD


Male Posts : 5078
Points : 18599
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2009-08-17
Location : San Francisco

Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO Empty
PostSubject: Re: Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO   Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO EmptySat Aug 29, 2009 10:55 pm

Nate is truly a cancer for any team he plays for.
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content





Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO Empty
PostSubject: Re: Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO   Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO Empty

Back to top Go down
 
Why are Knicks even considered keeping Nate Robinson? LMAO
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» Nate Robinson tried to talk his way out of a ticket? LMAO
» What do you think of Nate Robinson?
» OMFG Nate Robinson!
» No more Nate Robinson = 3 game win streak!!!
» Nate Robinson is staying in Boston

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Real Basketball Talk :: General NBA Talk :: General NBA-
Jump to: