Nate Robinson is staying in Boston

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_ylt=AonYZkpat.1ZQAGwbkrulwwqPaB4?slug=ap-celtics-robinson

TADAA!

I think it's 2 years, 9 million

In other news...

Ronnie Brewer is now a Bull (3 years, 12.5 million)

Scola is still a Rocket (5 years, 47 million)

and since nobody said anything, Shaun Livingston is a Bobcat o.O (2 years, 7 million)

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_ylt=AnuPXHAvM6R227rqyVCwGNu8vLYF?slug=ys-freeagentbuzz071610

Boston- Like it.
Chicago- Like it.
Houston- Love it.
Charlotte- Like it.

All good moves

Ronnie Brewer = opposite of Korver which is a good move since Reddick is very similar

Nate = GREAT

Scola = w/e

Livingston = potential All Star if hes back to 100%

Not w/e.

30 point scorer + hits awesome shots w/e. Thats how good this w/e is.

Scola was definitely the best move. I'm sure any team would love Scola. He can score, and he's an amazing defender. He takes good shots and grabs rebounds like the best of em. 16/9 is great for a PF. The Rockets don't really have a lot of depth with big men (besides Yao, CHUCK HAYES is their best big man if Scola left), so great move bringing him back.

All the other moves were good, but nothing like Scola.
Well Charlotte's move can't be considered good since this guy is coming back from that terrible injury, but we'll see how it goes

I wouldnt really say livingston s still coming back from the injury anymore. Its been awhile and he's established himself as an okay role player since then.

scola will be 35 when he's making 11 million o.O

livingston has great court vision but he doesn't run as fast or jump as high as he once did. i don't know if he ever will, but i still think he's not all the way back.

He played 36 games last year, and 12 the year before that...

Thats probably because of teams just not playing him, because all he is is an okay role player. Not because he was still injured.

Yeah. Teams don't play him because they don't think he's good, because his injury pretty much ruined his career

I think we have two different definitions of "coming off of"

From what I can tell from his game log is that the Thunder didnt play him(probably because they have a clusterfuck at guard) and then he got traded/released and the wizards signed him and he started playing pretty much every game.

And he was playing a shit load by the end of last season. anybody that plays in 42 minutes in one game probably isnt that affected by injuries.

oh
You win

lol

Shaun Livingston was good move.Luis Scola is potential All Star Power Forward

scola is 30 darko. how's he gunna make an all star game if he hasn't already? :/

This is his best chance

okay

Boston and Nate: I don't know if I like it. Nate won't play much. Rondo will get like 37-38 MPG. Nate can't really play 2 cuz he's so short. but he and rondo WILL play together at times... which won't be that great. 6'0 and 5'9 out there at the same time? idk about that. I can the celtics trading him though cuz I don't think he'll be happy playing like 13 MPG.

Bulls and Brewer: Pretty good signing. Like Ryan said, he's kinda the opposite of Korver. He defends and drives to the basket.. so he and Korver should be a good combo at 2. Plus his contract isn't bad.

Bobcats and Livingston- if he stays healthy, it could look like a great move. if not, then MJ fucked up again.

Rockets-Scola- I don't get this for one reason. The rockets drafted Patterson and traded for Jordan Hill last season. Hills PER 36 Mins last season would have been 14 PPG 10 RPG. The rockets are high on Patterson. So why keep scola? the dollar amount doesn't bother me. Scola doesn't have many minutes under his belt and he should be playing at this level until he's around 33-34.