God damn Blake Griffin!!!

First topic message reminder :

Impressive!!!

Camby doing work 2!!

His athleticism is the biggest reason for his play,but unlike Anthony Randolph and other players with that ability,he has a good basketball IQ and knows how to use it.Key difference

Rock bamas! wrote:

Fo' Shizzle wrote:

Your argument is fucking pointless, why say Blake Griffin without his athleticism would be mediocre when Amar'e would also be mediocre without his athlticism? If Amar'e wasn't athletic he wouldn't be nearly as good on offense, sure he has a jumpshot but he's no Dirk Nowitzki. He would barely get 5 rebounds per game. And his D would just be so terrible... He'd fucking suck. I know Blake wouldn't be all that good either, but he would still get 8 ~ 10 rebounds per game( No you don't fucking get 13 rpg purely off of athleticism). And he'd still have his good ball handling/passing.



Random fact: The last rookie to average 20 + pts, 10 + rbs, and 3 + ast( Blake's stats), was Larry Bird.

abdul, Blake doesnt have the post moves that amare has,jumpshot,and cant hit his Ft's like amare. Amare without his athleticism would be better than blake and his rebounding would remain decent,blakes would just fall off a cliff because he relies solely on athleticism.

Blake griffen doesnt have post moves?Are you on crack?

John wrote:

Rock bamas! wrote:

Fo' Shizzle wrote:

Your argument is fucking pointless, why say Blake Griffin without his athleticism would be mediocre when Amar'e would also be mediocre without his athlticism? If Amar'e wasn't athletic he wouldn't be nearly as good on offense, sure he has a jumpshot but he's no Dirk Nowitzki. He would barely get 5 rebounds per game. And his D would just be so terrible... He'd fucking suck. I know Blake wouldn't be all that good either, but he would still get 8 ~ 10 rebounds per game( No you don't fucking get 13 rpg purely off of athleticism). And he'd still have his good ball handling/passing.



Random fact: The last rookie to average 20 + pts, 10 + rbs, and 3 + ast( Blake's stats), was Larry Bird.

abdul, Blake doesnt have the post moves that amare has,jumpshot,and cant hit his Ft's like amare. Amare without his athleticism would be better than blake and his rebounding would remain decent,blakes would just fall off a cliff because he relies solely on athleticism.

Blake griffen doesnt have post moves?Are you on crack?

....

John wrote:

Rock bamas! wrote:

Fo' Shizzle wrote:

Your argument is fucking pointless, why say Blake Griffin without his athleticism would be mediocre when Amar'e would also be mediocre without his athlticism? If Amar'e wasn't athletic he wouldn't be nearly as good on offense, sure he has a jumpshot but he's no Dirk Nowitzki. He would barely get 5 rebounds per game. And his D would just be so terrible... He'd fucking suck. I know Blake wouldn't be all that good either, but he would still get 8 ~ 10 rebounds per game( No you don't fucking get 13 rpg purely off of athleticism). And he'd still have his good ball handling/passing.



Random fact: The last rookie to average 20 + pts, 10 + rbs, and 3 + ast( Blake's stats), was Larry Bird.

abdul, Blake doesnt have the post moves that amare has,jumpshot,and cant hit his Ft's like amare. Amare without his athleticism would be better than blake and his rebounding would remain decent,blakes would just fall off a cliff because he relies solely on athleticism.

Blake griffen doesnt have post moves?Are you on crack?

....

... I didn't fucking compare shit to Larry Bird you dumb asses. I just bought up a random fact that the last player to put up these stats was Larry Bird. And so what if Amar'e is better than Blake without athleticism. I already said Amar'e is better right now. You just bought that shit up to stray from the original argument cause you knew you looked like an ass. And I agree with John, Blake DOES have some post moves, not the best, but he has some. Of course you don't know that cause you obviously haven't watched Blake play. I bet all you've seen is highlights and you assume all he can do is dunk.

well youd lose your bet...and you cant expect people to just tune into the clippers game...ive seen maybe 5 or 6 or so games of the clips this year and i trust my abilitty to judge blakes game better than you even though youve seen more games just because i think i know alot more about what makes a good player than you know.

... Here we go again. How the fuck can you say he will be a poor mans Amar'e when he's comparable too PRIME Amar'e as a rookie? Are you trying to tell me Blake will stay the way he is now for his whole career? You think he won't improve in years to come? Go actually watch Blake play live and quit basing shit off ESPN highlights.

King wrote:

Fo' Shizzle wrote:

Your argument is fucking pointless, why say Blake Griffin without his athleticism would be mediocre when Amar'e would also be mediocre without his athlticism? If Amar'e wasn't athletic he wouldn't be nearly as good on offense, sure he has a jumpshot but he's no Dirk Nowitzki. He would barely get 5 rebounds per game. And his D would just be so terrible... He'd fucking suck. I know Blake wouldn't be all that good either, but he would still get 8 ~ 10 rebounds per game( No you don't fucking get 13 rpg purely off of athleticism). And he'd still have his good ball handling/passing.



Random fact: The last rookie to average 20 + pts, 10 + rbs, and 3 + ast( Blake's stats), was Larry Bird.

Amar'e Stoudemire is a MVP contender, and yet people thought Steve Nash made him better, LMAO. Blake Griffin is great, but he would be shit without his athleticism. Amar'e has more skill and better defense.

The truth hurts.

Also, are you seriously comparing Blake Griffin to Larry Bird? SHOOT YOURSELF, retard.

I hope you know that Amare`s Defence isnt Good.
He wasnt Comparing Blake to Bird..ARE YOU FUCKNG STUPID
He just said larry was the last one to do it,he didnt compare there game.
Blake is averging

20+ Points
10+ assist..

And you saying he will never be as good as amare,and wont mprove..Now you shoot yourself.

Do I need to bring out my list of guys who never improved?

Just cause there have been players who didn't improve doesn't mean you should just assume Blake will be one of them..

Rock bamas! wrote:

Do I need to bring out my list of guys who never improved?

Your stupid,Bringing a list of guys who didnt,does not prove SHIT.

Thats like saying:Wizards will 3 peat..You want a list of teams who did?

But from his side,don't assume that he will.

John wrote:

Rock bamas! wrote:

Do I need to bring out my list of guys who never improved?

Your stupid,Bringing a list of guys who didnt,does not prove SHIT.

Thats like saying:Wizards will 3 peat..You want a list of teams who did?

..you fail..

King wrote:

John wrote:

King wrote:

Fo' Shizzle wrote:

Your argument is fucking pointless, why say Blake Griffin without his athleticism would be mediocre when Amar'e would also be mediocre without his athlticism? If Amar'e wasn't athletic he wouldn't be nearly as good on offense, sure he has a jumpshot but he's no Dirk Nowitzki. He would barely get 5 rebounds per game. And his D would just be so terrible... He'd fucking suck. I know Blake wouldn't be all that good either, but he would still get 8 ~ 10 rebounds per game( No you don't fucking get 13 rpg purely off of athleticism). And he'd still have his good ball handling/passing.



Random fact: The last rookie to average 20 + pts, 10 + rbs, and 3 + ast( Blake's stats), was Larry Bird.

Amar'e Stoudemire is a MVP contender, and yet people thought Steve Nash made him better, LMAO. Blake Griffin is great, but he would be shit without his athleticism. Amar'e has more skill and better defense.

The truth hurts.

Also, are you seriously comparing Blake Griffin to Larry Bird? SHOOT YOURSELF, retard.

I hope you know that Amare`s Defence isnt Good.
He wasnt Comparing Blake to Bird..ARE YOU FUCKNG STUPID
He just said larry was the last one to do it,he didnt compare there game.
Blake is averging

20+ Points
10+ assist..

And you saying he will never be as good as amare,and wont mprove..Now you shoot yourself.

Blake isn't averaging 10+ assists, shit face.

Shaq averaged 20/13/3 (BLOCKS) his first season..

My bad...AND STFU,Who the Fuck are you anyway..FuckFace...Shit face..

In life f your ever going to debate,,learn how to prove it..

Rock bamas! wrote:

John wrote:

Rock bamas! wrote:

Do I need to bring out my list of guys who never improved?

Your stupid,Bringing a list of guys who didnt,does not prove SHIT.

Thats like saying:Wizards will 3 peat..You want a list of teams who did?

..you fail..

NAW,you fail.

John wrote:

King wrote:

John wrote:

King wrote:

Fo' Shizzle wrote:

Your argument is fucking pointless, why say Blake Griffin without his athleticism would be mediocre when Amar'e would also be mediocre without his athlticism? If Amar'e wasn't athletic he wouldn't be nearly as good on offense, sure he has a jumpshot but he's no Dirk Nowitzki. He would barely get 5 rebounds per game. And his D would just be so terrible... He'd fucking suck. I know Blake wouldn't be all that good either, but he would still get 8 ~ 10 rebounds per game( No you don't fucking get 13 rpg purely off of athleticism). And he'd still have his good ball handling/passing.



Random fact: The last rookie to average 20 + pts, 10 + rbs, and 3 + ast( Blake's stats), was Larry Bird.

Amar'e Stoudemire is a MVP contender, and yet people thought Steve Nash made him better, LMAO. Blake Griffin is great, but he would be shit without his athleticism. Amar'e has more skill and better defense.

The truth hurts.

Also, are you seriously comparing Blake Griffin to Larry Bird? SHOOT YOURSELF, retard.

I hope you know that Amare`s Defence isnt Good.
He wasnt Comparing Blake to Bird..ARE YOU FUCKNG STUPID
He just said larry was the last one to do it,he didnt compare there game.
Blake is averging

20+ Points
10+ assist..

And you saying he will never be as good as amare,and wont mprove..Now you shoot yourself.

Blake isn't averaging 10+ assists, shit face.

Shaq averaged 20/13/3 (BLOCKS) his first season..

My bad...AND STFU,Who the Fuck are you anyway..FuckFace...Shit face..

In life f your ever going to debate,,learn how to prove it..

I did prove it, which is why you're getting mad.

Oh, Shaq was the last rookie to post 20/10/3 actually, but if it has to include assists, then no.

Rock bamas! wrote:

John wrote:

Rock bamas! wrote:

John wrote:

Rock bamas! wrote:

Do I need to bring out my list of guys who never improved?

Your stupid,Bringing a list of guys who didnt,does not prove SHIT.

Thats like saying:Wizards will 3 peat..You want a list of teams who did?

..you fail..

NAW,you fail.

Bro he mad

No You Didn`t prove shit.In the arguements,all youve said is that he is madefrom athleticsm and with out it he wouldnt have shit or you put other peoples stats,and than you act like your winning the arguement..Just STFU

King wrote:

Rock bamas! wrote:

John wrote:

Rock bamas! wrote:

John wrote:

Rock bamas! wrote:

Do I need to bring out my list of guys who never improved?

Your stupid,Bringing a list of guys who didnt,does not prove SHIT.

Thats like saying:Wizards will 3 peat..You want a list of teams who did?

..you fail..

NAW,you fail.

Bro he mad

Fixed